UMassHoops.com Forum Index UMassHoops.com
The Minutemen fan's home on the Net
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Biggest choke

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which baseball choke is the biggest of all time?
1964 Phillies
3%
 3%  [ 1 ]
1986 Red Sox
7%
 7%  [ 2 ]
2004 Yankees
75%
 75%  [ 21 ]
2007 Mets
14%
 14%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 28

Author Message
MullinsManiac
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 2681
Location: Trumbull, CT

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:26 pm    Post subject: Biggest choke Reply with quote

I'll be interested to see if SavageNYCQueens chimes in.
_________________
MullinsManiac is on a drug ... it's called MullinsManiac.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PintOGuinness
Senior


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 1287

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regardless of what happens with the Mets - the 2004 Yanks win this award hands down.

Prior to 04, no team has ever, EVER lost four straight in any playoff series after winning the first three games.

THis is a no brainer.
_________________
Word to your motha!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ktabz16
Hall of Fame


Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 8834
Location: frozen tundra of ME

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

as far as regular season chokes, the mets aren't even close to the 78 red sox. not sure why that team isn't on the list.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Umm..7 games blownin the last two weeks is FAR worse than 14 games blown in the final two months. And people forget the Red Sox in '78 had to make a serious run at the end to come back and tie the Yankees.
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bharms08
Senior


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1315
Location: Birmingham

PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the jury's still out on the mets cause theyre tied in the division with one to play. if they were to win and the phillies lose then you cant put the mets in this discussion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LS71
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 5466
Location: Lost in Space

PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can the 14 Giants, 51 Dodgers or the 78 Red Sox be excluded?

The 1914 Boston Braves were 15 games back - dead last in eighth place on July 4-5, and ended up winning the National League pennant.

The NY Giants finished in second 10.5 games back (after having been in first on July 4th).

In this case, it's probably less of a collapse by the Giants and more the play of the "Miracle Braves", who played 68-19 - .782 ball for three months. Shocked.

The Braves then swept the Philadelphia Athletics in the World Series.

In 1951 the Giants were 13 and a half back of the Dodgers in mid-August. Then Bobby Thomson hit the shot heard round the world.

In 1978 the Sox were up 14 games in July and we all know how that turned out.

It's also hard to compare chokng over the curse of a season and choking in a series.

Series - Yankees 2004
Season - Phillies 1964 - They finished tied for 2nd with the Reds.
_________________
"Win without boasting, lose without crying." -- Julius Erving
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Feato
Senior


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 1906
Location: Amongst a bunch of 0's and 1's...

PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More of the concept I believe that you're up by a pretty large, if not relatively a near-insurmountable lead with a short timeframe left...and then you give it all up and end up on the short end of the stick.

That being said, you can toss the mets in now to that discussion...nice way to go too giving up 7 in the top of the 1st.
_________________
MF



I'm a professional smartass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
LS71
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 5466
Location: Lost in Space

PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How ironic is it that the Phillies are the beneficiaries of the Mets' collpase. Shocked
_________________
"Win without boasting, lose without crying." -- Julius Erving
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MertWindu
Junior


Joined: 14 May 2003
Posts: 293

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 64 Phils are the clear-cut winner. It's not difficult, it's just math. Biggest lead with the fewest amount of games left.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
subRed style by ktauber