UMassHoops.com Forum Index UMassHoops.com
The Minutemen fan's home on the Net
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2012 and Beyond the Micheletto Era
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> Hockey Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sam Minuteman
Senior


Joined: 09 Apr 2003
Posts: 1164
Location: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjmc85 wrote:
I think I like where you're going with this idea. However, a couple of observations/questions.

Aren't the season ticket holders on that side because they have the cushy seats? I think some might complain about losing a cushy seat and gaining a not cushy seat.

Is it too much to ask for the students to leave the people on the bench alone? Can't we put cops and staff right by the bench to insure that nothing happens? Would that even happen now? I don't remember the benches ever being the opposite which makes sense as Cahoon was coach my freshman year. Hopefully that culture is dead. Or am I expecting too much of our students?


Been a long time but as i recall the student side with no padding on the seats and the bench with an entrance from the back actually is a lot closer to the visitor locker room, while the UMass locker room is actually a bit of a walk.

It's too bad that they couldn't figure out a way to keep the benches the way they were. Since we are talking about college kids i don't think everyone will ever be happy, it's either "the students don't go to the games" or "the students are too rowdy and ruin it for everyone".
_________________
UConn girls are........................... Huskies!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BullmooseGEO
Junior


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 412
Location: Amherst

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On a similar note, is there a reason why we shoot twice at the net on the opposite side from the "main" student sections (S and T)? Does that have to do with the current bench configuration?

I am personally for switching benches per UMass02's suggestion, and erect some kind of barrier between the opposing bench and the students (as I don't expect them to behave nicely until the drastic changes to culture are effected...)

However, I am also wondering, and this is just a thought: is it possible to move the penalty boxes to the opposite side of the ice, to the *left* of the current home bench when facing ice? That might solve several problems:

1) per UMass02's points, it would easy to change player after penalty is served, as well as the home bench to communicate to the players in the box (does anyone know if that's legal, btw?)

2) most of the students will be further away and thus less able to harass the opposing player in the penalty box (security could be beefed up for big games)

3) Season tickets holders won't have their cushy seats taken away...

Thoughts?
_________________
"When in doubt, use brute force." -- Ken Thompson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dickie Dunn
Senior


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 832
Location: Capturing the spirit of the thing

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's pretty standard to defend the zone closest to your bench for two of the three periods of the game (first and third). Makes it much easier to do line changes, particularly for the defense, to avoid getting caught in odd-man rushes.

If you look at the Mullins configuration, the benches are sitting diagonally from each other between the red and blue lines.

NHL arenas have the benches next to each other (like the Garden), so teams always defend the end closest to their bench in the first and third. Alfond (Maine), Tsongas (UMass-Lowell) and Gutterson (UVM) are set up like this, as well.

The one thing swapping the team benches would do is put the penalty boxes next to the home bench, which would be an advantage. I'm pretty sure UMass is the only Hockey East school that puts the home team at a disadvantage by having the visitors' bench next to the penalty boxes.
_________________
I wrote this ... it's gotta be true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kieron
Sophomore


Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 175

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BullmooseGEO wrote:
On a similar note, is there a reason why we shoot twice at the net on the opposite side from the "main" student sections (S and T)? Does that have to do with the current bench configuration?

I am personally for switching benches per UMass02's suggestion, and erect some kind of barrier between the opposing bench and the students (as I don't expect them to behave nicely until the drastic changes to culture are effected...)


The benches were the other way round until 1999, when the student section behind the away bench (at the time) verbally abused a female member of the Merrimack coaching staff throughout a game and someone printed flyers questioning the sexuality of a Merrimack player which were distributed during the same game and some made their way to the away bench. So blame the student section behind the bench for the switch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> Hockey Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
subRed style by ktauber