| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xlgman Senior

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1291
|
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the 3 games I've been to this year, I've sat behind the bench. DK does not call plays. He reminds players where to go and what to do.
We do not run any set plays except out of timeouts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minutemaniac74 Senior

Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 1336 Location: Pittsfield, MA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
some of you need to write "there are no set plays in a DDM offense" on a chalkboard 500 times. Maybe then it will sink in that THERE ARE NO SET PLAYS IN THE DDM OFFENSE.
Basic principle of this offense, from wikipedia (and yes, I'm citing wikipedia haha):
"The offense uses no set plays, and instead relies on the speed and decision making of its players, primarily the point guard. "I feel we're teaching kids how to play basketball instead of how to run plays" says Walberg of the offense. Coaches that rely upon the offense have said that they do most of their coaching work in practices rather than games" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xlgman Senior

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1291
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Minutemaniac74 wrote: | some of you need to write "there are no set plays in a DDM offense" on a chalkboard 500 times. Maybe then it will sink in that THERE ARE NO SET PLAYS IN THE DDM OFFENSE.
|
Is everyone who posts here supposed to write a research paper on DDM and pass an entrance exam first before posting? Why cant you just post the info without slamming him?
Some here have also claimed that we do not run the DDM at all, but a modified version of it with limited high screens to help jump start some penetration. Yet others will say that we run the modified DDM less than half the time, although I've yet to hear from anyone exactly what they think we run when it is not DDM. Quite honestly, I watch nearly every game and follow the team as much as anyone and there are many times when I have no idea what we are doing on offense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmc24 Sophomore
Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Posts: 94 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dude i was not just asking about offense. I understand the DDM concept, but even in the DDM it can begin with a weave, dribble hand-off w or w/o high screen etc.... I was talking about the complete game to include defense and trying get a feel for coach's leadership and philosophy.
thanks for the lesson on how to use wikipedia. I think i might go coach cyo now |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dandabombe Freshman
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For Vance being such an acclaimed "X's and O's" expert, with this offense being his baby and coaches all around the country using forms of his offense, why is it that we have the worst out of bounds plays of any team at any level of basketball... Usually a team looks to throw the ball in from under the basket to half court as a 4th option, after options 1-3 are covered, but our goal seems to be to throw the ball there every time. I don't know how many other people have noticed this, but I go to every home game and have for years now and this one of the two things that frustrates me most about this team (the other being that nobody passes when we have numbers on a fast break, with gurley being guilty of this EVERY time, but thats a whole other story...)
So hopefully I'm not the only one who has noticed this and thanks for letting me vent. _________________ Heroes get remembered, but legends never die, follow your heart kid, and you'll never go wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DK20 Freshman

Joined: 05 Dec 2008 Posts: 66 Location: Northampton
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dandabombe, I completely agree. I noticed this last year as well. An inbounds should be an opportunity to freely run people without the ball and get a good look at the hoop. When you watch some of the top teams play they almost always are able to either get the ball somewhere under the basket or get a good look for 3. Both years under Kellogg we have just thrown it 30 feet from the basket, which is not only dangerous but it makes us reset our whole offense. If this pass is stolen, which it has been a couple times, it leads to an uncontested fastbreak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rayers Junior
Joined: 17 Apr 2003 Posts: 531
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For anyone who watched St. Mary's destroy Richmond or Washington beat Marquette it was a first hand chance to see why DDM is so limited. Strong post play is impossible to stop and can set up so much more than a drive and kick. When the play gets to the level of the tourney the DDM sucks unless you have NBA caliber guards. I wish DK would see the error of his ways... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shovelhd Hall of Fame

Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 4181
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I didn't think that Richmond or Marquette were playing the DDM. If your point was that we should be playing a more traditional post offense, who on our squad is a big, strong frontcourt player that can finish in the post consistently? Sean Carter can't, neither can Bailey. Vinson has a chance, but he has to get bigger and stronger. So instead, we blame the system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xlgman Senior

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1291
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure if it'll hold throughout the first round but on the first day of play, the 3 ball was a huge factor. The winning teams all shot as well or better from 3 than the losers (except for Richmond who got eaten by St. Mary's big man). The difference was substantial, too. +/-42% by the winners vs. +/-32% for the losers. This is no small sample either - over 650 attempts total with the losers taking a lot more and making a lot less (sound familiar?)
Rayer's is right that you need a post presence in the dance. But you also need 3PT shooting. We have neither and that's why our players are on the beach in FL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chapter 11 Sophomore
Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Posts: 107 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| any thoughts on changing the title of this thread? This conversation has taken various positions and a less objectionable title seems appropriate. He's our coach and while anyone can question his ways, it seems a bit harsh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xlgman Senior

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1291
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^
I second the motion. Although the misspelling of the name has become somewhat of a legend in the chat room..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Merlin Samuels Freshman

Joined: 10 Aug 2008 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
^
Talkin' Vince Wahlberg. Maybe he'll be offered the St. John's or Seton Hall job.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uz2b-len Hall of Fame

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3373 Location: Hadley, MA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why would anyone offer him a head coaching job? Seriously. Maybe an assistant. _________________ Always remember you are unique, just like everyone else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swampy Senior

Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 1266
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The way Steele, Kelsey and "Bino" Ranson have been yapping at Chris Mack during their tourney games I'm surprised the X fans aren't hollering for their heads! According to some people around here assistant coaches should just sit on the bench and shut the f*** up! _________________ "It's not like we have two average Joes. These are high-level Johns." KMorris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PTrainXL Junior
Joined: 14 Feb 2009 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Damn you Vince, I mean Vance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|