 |
UMassHoops.com The Minutemen fan's home on the Net
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sleepy sheep Senior
Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 943 Location: Boston
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dennisdent Junior

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 639 Location: Too close to the Beltway
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent article, the writer did their homework. I like the quotes from Lombardi.
Max Page most be loving the attention from the NY Times--probably adding it to his bio right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
m626t Senior

Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 1312 Location: Western Mass
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this article is another example of why NYC is better than Bean Town. _________________ All due respect, and I mean that from the bottom of my heart, I'm gonna pass. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
photoman Senior
Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Posts: 933 Location: Attleboro
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dennisdent wrote: | Excellent article, the writer did their homework. I like the quotes from Lombardi.
Max Page most be loving the attention from the NY Times--probably adding it to his bio right now. |
This would hardly be the writer doing his homework: "To make the leap more concrete, UMass decided to play its home games at Gillette Stadium, the domain of the N.F.L.’s New England Patriots."
I'll give the writer an "F" on that homework because as has been stated ad nauseum, The move WOULDN'T have happened without the Gillette move. The MAC insisted on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
InnervisionsUMASS Hall of Fame

Joined: 04 Apr 2003 Posts: 16583 Location: Milford, MA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| m626t wrote: | | this article is another example of why NYC is better than Bean Town. |
Ummmm, no.
And thank you photoman. _________________ Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
78 Hall of Fame

Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 4058 Location: Near Boston
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lombardi's comments at the end of the article are interesting. He states that there are already too many teams in FBS, and with more entering, the NCAA is going to have to make changes. Basically, establishing a top tier of teams and then lower tiers. (Although they really already do that with BCS and FBS, I guess.) His point though is will these universities who have spent the money to move up to FBS be happy when they end up being in the lowest division of FBS or however the NCAA decides to organize the teams?
Overall, I thought this was a good piece that provides a good overview of the FBS dilemma schools face. _________________ If only I could be as great a fan as Pierce9999.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
econalum Hall of Fame

Joined: 12 Apr 2003 Posts: 2442 Location: Acton, MA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This article was fair. And as has been stated before, by myself, and others, if you are not in the 'Top 64' - where are you? Effectively, you are in a bigger $ losing FCS. And the gaps will grow wider.
And, while UNC-Charlotte had a quick Alum commitment of several $ millions, UMASS got a big yawn from our alums, both in donations, and season tix. This gets to the root of 'do alums care about UMASS football', and 'was there lingering demand ready to be plucked'? The answer - NO. There was not a ground swell. If W-L results improve, perhaps Season tix will come.
I think that this IS the difference between the modern North versus South. Northern teams drop football, Southern seek to move up. With support.
Next year is a new season - with Charlie having a couple more months for recruiting quality athletes.
The disconnect on this message board amounts to this. The consensus of this board seems to be, like McCutcheon, that 3 or 4 more years are needed to prove out this experiment. In reality, given the UBuffalo example, 15 or more may not be enough. But, will Swammy, and the governing bodies, give UM that long to be competitive (not in wins, but in fannies in chairs)?
We'll see. I think that UMASS will have to spend a lot more money and effort to build single game buys, than season ticket sales, as folks may attend the 1 or 2 games, but not buy the package.
Like climbing Mount Everest, it is a slow slog. And some fall by the wayside. _________________ Feeling entitled is JUST a feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SJGMoney Junior

Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Posts: 492 Location: Danvers, MA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ Yawn _________________ UMass '87 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jackman Senior

Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 1978
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 78 wrote: | | Lombardi's comments at the end of the article are interesting. He states that there are already too many teams in FBS, and with more entering, the NCAA is going to have to make changes. |
The NCAA already made changes. They instituted a 4 year moratorium, then added a new requirement that you have to receive an invitation to an existing FBS conference to move up. Then, through various maneuverings, they killed off one of the conferences (the WAC), thus for all intensive purposes permanently removing 10 to 16 slots in FBS because it's so hard to create a new conference.
So now all these crying BCS schools have to do to prevent more move-ups from FCS is to STOP RAIDING LOWER CONFERENCES. That's it. Do that, and there's nowhere for these teams to move-up to because the lower conferences will be full. It just looks like a rush now because they shut and locked the doors for the 4 year moratorium.
As for the NYT article, I disagree that it was fair. It just looks fair in comparison to the atrocious Boston Globe. They still used the faculty's slanted numbers as their cost source without explaining that it was slanted, and used our worst game as an attendance example without pointing out that it was on Black Friday and most MAC teams actually fared worse than UMass from the conference's decision to schedule games that day. They then say that we averaged "around 14000" attendance at McGuirk in recent years, which is simply false. Our best ever average in the modern era was 13005. The only way our average creeps north of that is if you count the Gillette Stadium games against UNH. Oops.
| econalum wrote: | | And, while UNC-Charlotte had a quick Alum commitment of several $ millions[...] |
That's not an accurate description. Charlotte struggled quite a bit to sell its FSLs for the initial fundraising. They had to push back the deadline at least a half a dozen times. There was a lot of anxiety on the Charlotte message boards about this. Granted, Charlotte demanded a much larger financial commitment from its fans than UMass did. On the other hand, Charlotte is spending $45 million to construct a stadium smaller than McGuirk.
If UMass ticket sales are $700k under budget every single year for the next 60 years in a row, that still won't amount to the $45 million Charlotte is spending before taking a single snap of transitional FCS football. THAT is a risk. UBuffalo for its part spent about $40 million in 2012 money on their stadium back in the 90s. UMass spending $0 to play in Gillette Stadium is the least amount of risk anyone has ever taken on FBS football, yet somehow we're the poster child for foolhardy gambles on big time football. How do they get away with writing this crap? It's inaccurate and unfair. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CrooksisRhyming Hall of Fame

Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 2743 Location: Oak Square
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jackman, I don't know what you drink, but if I ever get the opportunity, I'm buying. _________________ "Wherever I go, I’ll never be bashful about being from UMass, baby.” -Victor Cruz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wmmmfan Sophomore
Joined: 20 Aug 2010 Posts: 219
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jackman you are spot on with your comments, UMass has the least amount at risk of any team to have ever made this move.
The other point some people are missing and this article points out is the additional publicity and increased revenue from applications/admissions this move could generate.
Is there a specific fund individuals can donate to for the building going up at McGuirk? I don't think I've seen anything for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Berkman Hall of Fame
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 3751 Location: The Berkshires
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| From what I was told in the past, there in no general fund drive for individuals to contribute to but I am sure that they will accept any funds you would like to contribute. Their main fund raising effort was geared to major donors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lane one Junior
Joined: 17 Aug 2003 Posts: 676
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If they start collecting money for a specific purpose, they must use it for that purpose. I suspect they want to get the major donor set up to get them most of the way there before taking smaller amounts. Right now, the best thing you can do is send a check to the athletic department, and ask it to be earmarked for football. They need to show a groundswell of support (in terms of # of donors and total $) from alumni to get the heavy hitters to donate what they need for facilities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
InnervisionsUMASS Hall of Fame

Joined: 04 Apr 2003 Posts: 16583 Location: Milford, MA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jackman wrote: | | 78 wrote: | | Lombardi's comments at the end of the article are interesting. He states that there are already too many teams in FBS, and with more entering, the NCAA is going to have to make changes. |
The NCAA already made changes. They instituted a 4 year moratorium, then added a new requirement that you have to receive an invitation to an existing FBS conference to move up. Then, through various maneuverings, they killed off one of the conferences (the WAC), thus for all intensive purposes permanently removing 10 to 16 slots in FBS because it's so hard to create a new conference.
So now all these crying BCS schools have to do to prevent more move-ups from FCS is to STOP RAIDING LOWER CONFERENCES. That's it. Do that, and there's nowhere for these teams to move-up to because the lower conferences will be full. It just looks like a rush now because they shut and locked the doors for the 4 year moratorium.
As for the NYT article, I disagree that it was fair. It just looks fair in comparison to the atrocious Boston Globe. They still used the faculty's slanted numbers as their cost source without explaining that it was slanted, and used our worst game as an attendance example without pointing out that it was on Black Friday and most MAC teams actually fared worse than UMass from the conference's decision to schedule games that day. They then say that we averaged "around 14000" attendance at McGuirk in recent years, which is simply false. Our best ever average in the modern era was 13005. The only way our average creeps north of that is if you count the Gillette Stadium games against UNH. Oops.
| econalum wrote: | | And, while UNC-Charlotte had a quick Alum commitment of several $ millions[...] |
That's not an accurate description. Charlotte struggled quite a bit to sell its FSLs for the initial fundraising. They had to push back the deadline at least a half a dozen times. There was a lot of anxiety on the Charlotte message boards about this. Granted, Charlotte demanded a much larger financial commitment from its fans than UMass did. On the other hand, Charlotte is spending $45 million to construct a stadium smaller than McGuirk.
If UMass ticket sales are $700k under budget every single year for the next 60 years in a row, that still won't amount to the $45 million Charlotte is spending before taking a single snap of transitional FCS football. THAT is a risk. UBuffalo for its part spent about $40 million in 2012 money on their stadium back in the 90s. UMass spending $0 to play in Gillette Stadium is the least amount of risk anyone has ever taken on FBS football, yet somehow we're the poster child for foolhardy gambles on big time football. How do they get away with writing this crap? It's inaccurate and unfair. |
I just wanted to quote this so that people can read it again. _________________ Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SJGMoney Junior

Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Posts: 492 Location: Danvers, MA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^ And I want to point to it so people read it a third time. G-damn Jackman, that was well said _________________ UMass '87 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group subRed style by ktauber
|