UMassHoops.com Forum Index UMassHoops.com
The Minutemen fan's home on the Net
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

novas hopes dashed
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> Football Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tubby Raymond
Junior


Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Posts: 298
Location: Southeastern PA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:09 am    Post subject: novas hopes dashed Reply with quote

Laughing

nova decided to postpone the vote on moving to the BE knowing they would be rejected due to not having a big enough yard to play in. This kind of nonsense on novas part makes the Hens fans so sad for them Laughing

They have always been a such a class act Rolling Eyes . Nice they have been brought down a few notches from thier (self proclaimed) lofty perch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOf96and98
Hall of Fame


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 2623
Location: The Big Easy

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're a good poster here Tubby, and you can say what you want about Nova, but at least they decided to try and take on the challenge of moving up to FBS. You guys like to talk about your enormous fan base and commitment to football yet remain afraid of the challenges of no longer being a big fish in a small pond.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tubby Raymond
Junior


Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Posts: 298
Location: Southeastern PA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^
Well, while that's an interesting perspective, the "we are scardy cats" theroem, I'm not sure it is entirely accurrate. The only enourmous thing I like to talk about is in my ...... oh well, that's not for the football message board.

Take on the challenge? Let's ponder that a moment. nova's situation was a type of fools gold. They don't have the facility, fan base, money in the bank or adminstrative support to bolster that kind of move. They would be the welfare recipients for the rest of the league. Clearly not a burden Pitt etal were interested in. Funny thing is, everybody should have known that, especially the nova folks.

We on the other hand, make money playing football. How much more $ would we make if we made the jump? Not sure but, when you do the risk analysis, the risk far outweights the benefits. We are who we are. A mid-Atlantic school of 15,000+ with a fan base made up of non-alumni locals who are comfortable right where we are in terms of our competition. Now if someone would "show us the $" then we might be interested but until that point why would we move? National exposure?

And for the "big fish small pond" analogy, that really doesn't work anymore. Either the pond has gotten bigger or the other fish are growing. Look at the programs @ JMU, UR, William and Mary etc, who used to be 2nd rate citizens in the conferance, no more. New facilities, growing attendance etc I'm sure you've noticed that the southern part of the conferance is moving in a different direction than the northern part (URI, UMaine). With the addition of ODU & GSU the gravitational pull is moving even further south.

UD will always have a home wherever it want to lay it's head. It's too appealing in too many ways to be left out in the cold in any big conferance realignment situation. We won't have to worry about not getting asked to the prom, I promise. We put out, and everybody knows it Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UMass87
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 7335

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got to agree with Tubby. Because they make money on football and have such a good fan base they are in relatively special position in terms of FCS football. Nova and UMass need FBS to stop the financial bleeding of FCS. That's just not the case for UD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOf96and98
Hall of Fame


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 2623
Location: The Big Easy

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just MHO, but Tubby's post just reinforces my point. You admit your fan base is made up of non-alums, so they dont care how much money you make playing football or might make upgrading football because they support the football team first and the university second, if at all. Sports are about competition, and UD's "we're just fine where we are" attitude is really just "we're worried we might not be able to be as good every year if we move up and we couldn't handle that" in disguise.

The big fish in a small pond analogy is in reference to FCS, not the CAA. You are still in the distinct minority in terms of FCS schools with a passionate, dedicated fan base and a tradition of winning, and that is what you hang your hat on and what your fans live for. You wouldn't know how to handle being just another school in an FBS conference, even if you were a winner, because being a big fish in the FCS is your claim to fame and the source of your fans' pride.

The reality, however, is that your football program is too well-run and well-supported and your fans too passionate and commited to justify staying in the FCS forever. If you do, you're just selling yourself short because you're afraid of failure and the hit your collective egos would take if you didn't get to be the big boys any longer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DPBOS
Sophomore


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 135
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:16 am    Post subject: Re: novas hopes dashed Reply with quote

Tubby Raymond wrote:
novas hopes dashed
Time may tell, but right now "Nova dashed its' hopes" appears to be a more accurate subject heading. 18K seat stadium, no expansion plans, no progress towards a contract with stadium owners/municipality, no commitment reached with Philly MLS team (principal tenant), etc. Maybe it works out for Nova, but they sure don't appear to have lined up their ducks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpatsfan
Sophomore


Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bye bye UD, HELLO MAC!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tubby Raymond
Junior


Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Posts: 298
Location: Southeastern PA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShadesOf96and98 wrote:
Sports are about competition, and UD's "we're just fine where we are" attitude is really just "we're worried we might not be able to be as good every year if we move up and we couldn't handle that" in disguise.


This is a bit naive. College athletics is all about the almighty dollar. My kids little league, now that's about competition.

I'm not picking up the inherant subtext of fear that seem to be wishful thinking on your part. Wherever UD has played football, they have been successful. Why would anyone believe that wouldn't continue?

I'm guessing that most UD folks would say that our claim to fame is those NC's we have acquired over the years.

Still not getting the selling ourselves short concept. What goals are we not achieving? We have our niche in the market and will stay there as long as it meets our needs. When it doesn't we will most likely follow whatever course makes the most sense, FINANCIALLY.

That is all Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOf96and98
Hall of Fame


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 2623
Location: The Big Easy

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What percentage of your fan base do you think cares about your financial bottom line? 5 percent? 10 percent? I'd be surprised if it's even that high. NCAA football is about money for the universities, the executives, the sponsors, the television folks and the bowl games. For the fans, it's about competition and nothing more. You know that.

If there is this inherent belief that you guys will be successful at any level of football you decide to play in, why wouldnt you want that to be the FBS? The answer is simple: There isn't that belief. You make it sound like you've barnstormed all over the world beating teams of all shapes and sizes, when in reality you've played in two lower-tier divisions and won only one national championship in 30 years in the higher of the two - the same number we have. I mean come on, how many of your fans today are riding high because of those Division II national titles in the 70s and whenever your other stone age titles took place? Were you guys even in organized leagues then?

As I said, the reality here is that you're not confident you would maintain your winning tradition if you were competing against schools with similar resources and support, so you'd rather stay where you know you're a step ahead than take a bold leap to a place where you're on par with everyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tubby Raymond
Junior


Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Posts: 298
Location: Southeastern PA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShadesOf96and98 wrote:
What percentage of your fan base do you think cares about your financial bottom line? 5 percent? 10 percent? I'd be surprised if it's even that high. NCAA football is about money for the universities, the executives, the sponsors, the television folks and the bowl games. For the fans, it's about competition and nothing more. You know that.

If there is this inherent belief that you guys will be successful at any level of football you decide to play in, why wouldnt you want that to be the FBS? The answer is simple: There isn't that belief. You make it sound like you've barnstormed all over the world beating teams of all shapes and sizes, when in reality you've played in two lower-tier divisions and won only one national championship in 30 years in the higher of the two - the same number we have. I mean come on, how many of your fans today are riding high because of those Division II national titles in the 70s and whenever your other stone age titles took place? Were you guys even in organized leagues then?

As I said, the reality here is that you're not confident you would maintain your winning tradition if you were competing against schools with similar resources and support, so you'd rather stay where you know you're a step ahead than take a bold leap to a place where you're on par with everyone else.


You don't know our fanbase I'm afraid. Take a peek @ gohens.net and look at the NC's mentioned. Think that todays fans aren't as proud of the post WW-II NC's as they are about the most recent one? We got lots of bluehairs, some posters on gohens that were around even then.

One does not judge a program on NC's alone. Look at our winning percentages over time. I don't have my media guide with me but, I believe during Tubby's tenure, there were 3 or 4 losing seasons. Remember the guy had 300 wins. The number of times we made the playoffs, lots & lots. # of times we advanced in the playoffs, lots.

Not sure how old a guy you are but how'd that workout for nova the last time? They dropped thier football program from 81-83 cause they couldn't make it work. Explain to me what the upside of UD moving up would be?

Increased tickets sales
Increased Donations
Increasing the fanbase

All of those numbers are stable or rising.

Fanbase schmanbase, institutions make those decision about moving up or not based soley on the bottom line. Fanbase has little to do with moving the direction of the decisons unless there is anticipation that the move would increase revenue.

Your point of the about the competiton being the sole focus of fans, what's wrong with the competition we now face? Do you know what the relative rankings of conferances are in college football irrespective of thier classification. Take a look, you might be surprised. See how the MAC compares to the CAA.

Why would we want to move up? This is the question that you need to answer for there too be any relevance to your argument.

What is your assertion that whomever doesn't think we could compete at the next level based on? (Have any idea how we've been doing against Navy for the past however many years?)

It nice to be in a unique situation where we know we are going to be pursued by someone to join a conferance. There has been much banter about what a new conferance for us would look like. But it's moot point at this stage in the process.

We don't need to go anywhere. We are successful by whatever measure you can take. The suggestion that there is some kind of (penis) envy involved in being associated with "the big boys" is silly. And since we are worried about how we will measure up we won't pull our pants down?

Again I'll ask, How would our football program be enhanced by moving up?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris20
Hall of Fame


Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 7358
Location: Springfield

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shades, the decision to move up or not is based on MANY more factors than simply having the balls to do so.

I am not the "move-up" expert that many are on this board.....but certainly it might not be in every programs interest, for 100 reasons. I think it's a little short sighted to flat out accuse the Hens of being wimpy, when there is much more that goes into a decision like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chapter 11
Junior


Joined: 26 Apr 2003
Posts: 304
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been to the University of Delaware numerous times and have an alum in the family. It's an excellent school, well run and the area is quite proud of their Hens. Their model works for them and I'm sure they will be able to adapt. Their tradition is quite strong. I'm not connected to their inner workings yet their resources seem well apportioned.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UMass02
Hall of Fame


Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 2144

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the school and their fanbase are happy with the status quo, then who are we to say otherwise? If everyone is happy, then why ruin it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOf96and98
Hall of Fame


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 2623
Location: The Big Easy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris20 wrote:
Shades, the decision to move up or not is based on MANY more factors than simply having the balls to do so.

I am not the "move-up" expert that many are on this board.....but certainly it might not be in every programs interest, for 100 reasons. I think it's a little short sighted to flat out accuse the Hens of being wimpy, when there is much more that goes into a decision like that.


Well no shit...and UD is one of probably two schools in FCS (the other being Montana) that already have all the other bases covered and their ducks in a row for a move up. The only thing keeping them from making it happen is the desire to do so, which goes back to my original points.

Either way, I started off my responses to Tubby by stating this is all just my humble opinion, which it all is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
InnervisionsUMASS
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 16405
Location: Milford, MA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't matter anymore! Sorry Nova, and UD, I hope we see you make the move sometime soon! LETS GO UMASS!!!
_________________
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> Football Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
subRed style by ktauber