UMassHoops.com Forum Index UMassHoops.com
The Minutemen fan's home on the Net
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Baseball Controversy
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do you feel the coaches were "unethical" intentionally walking the player?
yes
47%
 47%  [ 9 ]
no
52%
 52%  [ 10 ]
Total Votes : 19

Author Message
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:46 am    Post subject: Baseball Controversy Reply with quote

There is a interesting (but long) article on ESPN regarding ethics in youth baseball. The example they cite has gotten some national attention. I was wondering what others thought of the situation.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2549340

I have coached youth and high school baseball and I am somewhat torn in my thoughts on the subject. Part of me says it is awful that this kid who has endured so much had to be put in that situation. But, another part of me says that part of coaching is teaching the kids the game and how it is played in all facets. It is also teaching kids how to handle winning and losing with class. It is a tough call, and I could easily argue both sides.
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ktabz16
Hall of Fame


Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 8816
Location: frozen tundra of ME

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i just have so many issues with more than just the coach's decision... i have a problem with little league players on tv... in theory, we shouldn't even know about this incident... the second underlying issue that is more gray than black or white is overzeolous parents in these youth sports.... there shouldn't be as much importance in winning or losing, however, there shouldn't be a situation like the mass youth soccer association that doesn't keep score.... i guess i lean toward pitching to the good player and if he beats you, then you took the best of what that team gave you and came out on the wrong side of it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Crank
Senior


Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 1052
Location: Berkshire Expatriate in MetroWest

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my mind, intentionally walking the good hitter to get to the cancer patient shows everything that is wrong with youth sports these days. Some overblown athletic wanna-be coach taking the guaranteed win so he would be a "champion". These are 9 year old kids; winning and losing should not be the be-all/end-all goal of such a league. I've got no problem with them keeping score and declaring a winner and loser, but play it straight up to get there.

If the "good" hitter had legitimately walked/got hit by a pitch/got a hit that didn't win the game, I have no problem with the sick child then having to come up with the game on the line and ultimately failing. In his situation, I'm quite sure he wants to be thought of as a full member of the team with no special treatment afforded to him. By the same token, he shouldn't have to endure being singled out for the type of "special treatment" that he was treated to by the opposing coach. In my mind, what that coach did was appalling, and I sincerely hope that karma is the bitch I believe she is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kosty
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 5690
Location: The Shore to the South

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Say the kid is not a cancer patient, just a shitty hitter that is very uncoordinated? Do you still walk the good hitter to pitch to the shitty kid?? Same thing in my opinion. It's a baseball decision and this has been blown WAY TOO FAR out of proportion. Do we start giving kids with learning disabilities easier words to spell in spelling bees??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crank wrote:
If the "good" hitter had legitimately walked/got hit by a pitch/got a hit that didn't win the game, I have no problem with the sick child then having to come up with the game on the line and ultimately failing. In his situation, I'm quite sure he wants to be thought of as a full member of the team with no special treatment afforded to him. By the same token, he shouldn't have to endure being singled out for the type of "special treatment" that he was treated to by the opposing coach. In my mind, what that coach did was appalling, and I sincerely hope that karma is the bitch I believe she is.


My counter-argument (and I can see your side) is that sports is about winning and losing. And youth sports is about learning how to win and lose with class. I do know that as a youth coach at a higher level, intentional walks are very common. They are a big part of the game.

Also, say a team has a catcher who has a problem throwing down to second base, does that mean the opposing team should not steal? I just do not know where you draw the line.....but since I do not know I would say the rule book is a good place to start. The coaches followed the rules.

I have argued for years that stuff likt this is the reason baseball, in some areas, has trouble getting kids to play in the numbers they used to play. In baseball there are a myriad of moments both as a hitter and a fielder where you can be subject to failing in a way that stands out. That is why youth soccer is so big, it is much easier to simply blend in and not feel the emberassment of the same type of public failure. But, to me, it is part of the sport...and if handled correctly can help build character on both sides.
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crank
Senior


Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 1052
Location: Berkshire Expatriate in MetroWest

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no problem with the kid ultimately failing. When it's legitimately his turn at bat, let the chips fall where they may. The act of intentionally putting him in that spot knowing that he will fail is the problem. Yes, it is within the rules, but knowing what they all knew about this kid's situation just shows a lack of class and character on the part of the coach.

And Kosty, to use your spelling bee analogy, this would be the equivilant of a school principal intentionally giving the smart kid the word "dog" and subsequently giving the learning disabled child "onomatopoeia" in order to ensure that the smart kid will represent his school in the city finals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crank wrote:
And Kosty, to use your spelling bee analogy, this would be the equivilant of a school principal intentionally giving the smart kid the word "dog" and subsequently giving the learning disabled child "onomatopoeia" in order to ensure that the smart kid will represent his school in the city finals.


That is not a fair analogy at all. The fair analogy would be that if through 12 rounds one kid had spelled every word right, and one kid every word wrong which one would you call on if the spelling bee was on the line.

You also did not respond to my question about a catcher whi cannot throw to second. How is that situation different?...and where do you draw the line?
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
local
Junior


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 742
Location: WMass

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is an issue that says a lot about our society. I think if you talked to kids and left the adults out of it they would mostly want to go out and have fun and play the game. Adults are the ones who make it about winning and losing. In the grand scheme of life the value in sports is not going to be about winning and losing for 99% of people, unless you are getting paid. The value in sports for most adults and in the long term most kids is about recreation, fitness and fun. If I win or lose on the golf course this weekend it will really have very little impact on my life. I think that if you are taught to be a respectful and classy person that you will be able win or lose in sports or anything else with class.

Kosty your right, next thing you know someone will be putting up ramps for kids in wheelchairs or having a special unspoken language for the deaf. Rolling Eyes
_________________
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."- HST
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Local,

I get your point, and I think you are just stretching the context of sports too far. Sports by definition is competitive. Some kids will always play more than others. One team will win or lose. Some kids will succeed and some will fail. Their are many activities that kids can participate in that provide fun and fitness, but are not competitive. When you participate in sports, their will be winners and losers.

I do not think using sign language or handicap ramps as analogy fits at all. Both of things allow people with certain difficulties perform the basic aspects of their life. Sports does not perform that same function. It is an optional activity.

As a person who works a lot with youth groups (both sports-wise and educationally) one of the biggest problems today (especially in Amherst) is that kids never learn how to deal with failure or loss. They are coddled from day 1 and when the face the harsh realities of the real world they are completely unprepared to deal with any kind of adversity.
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crank
Senior


Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 1052
Location: Berkshire Expatriate in MetroWest

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VOR, I didn't answer your question re: the catcher because in my mind it has nothing to do with the issue at hand...First of all, kids steal bases all of the time at that level so it is much more of a regular part of the game and second, the vast majority of kids that age won't be gunning down runners regularly anyway, so it really isn't singling him out in the same manner.

In all of the time I've played, umpired and coached Little League baseball, I don't recall ever seeing someone intentionally walked at all. It just isn't done. I've seen plenty of kids who are terrible hitters at that level, but I've never seen a coach intentionally walk another player so they could face them. This coach went out of his way to get the guaranteed win, that's the bottom line. At that age, it should be about more than that.

Once again, I have no problem with the kid ultimately failing and losing the game...it's the manner in which it got to that point that I have a problem with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chris20
Hall of Fame


Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 7355
Location: Springfield

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with Crank....gotta pitch to the kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Used to be VOR
Hall of Fame


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 5639

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crank wrote:
VOR, I didn't answer your question re: the catcher because in my mind it has nothing to do with the issue at hand...First of all, kids steal bases all of the time at that level so it is much more of a regular part of the game and second, the vast majority of kids that age won't be gunning down runners regularly anyway, so it really isn't singling him out in the same manner.


Ok, if you do not like the base-stealing analogy how about this....

Another common thing from youth baseball. Say a kid clearly has no pwer, so a coach brings all his outfielders in to the edge of the infield. The kid is clearly going to be emberassed and singled out for his weakness. Should the coach also not do that?
_________________
Turns out, just because you write your name on a baby doesn't mean you get to keep it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crank
Senior


Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 1052
Location: Berkshire Expatriate in MetroWest

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Putting them all in the infield is too much of a slap in the face; I don't think they should do that either. Bring them in a bit, fine but don't go overboard. There's no reason to go out of the way to embarrass someone. It's similar to heckling a kid to rattle him. It may be legal, but you just don't do it to 9 year olds, even if it helps your team win.

We could play this analogy game all day, however and it won't get anywhere. Play a fair, good-spirited game, treat the players and opponents with respect, play your best on the field and let the winning and losing take care of itself. Why is this so hard?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
local
Junior


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 742
Location: WMass

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Used to be VOR wrote:
Local,

I get your point, and I think you are just stretching the context of sports too far. Sports by definition is competitive. Some kids will always play more than others. One team will win or lose. Some kids will succeed and some will fail. Their are many activities that kids can participate in that provide fun and fitness, but are not competitive. When you participate in sports, their will be winners and losers.

I do not think using sign language or handicap ramps as analogy fits at all. Both of things allow people with certain difficulties perform the basic aspects of their life. Sports does not perform that same function. It is an optional activity.

As a person who works a lot with youth groups (both sports-wise and educationally) one of the biggest problems today (especially in Amherst) is that kids never learn how to deal with failure or loss. They are coddled from day 1 and when the face the harsh realities of the real world they are completely unprepared to deal with any kind of adversity.


VOR -

In this specific example what is the message you are sending to the pitcher? You can not get this kid out so don't even try. Is that a good thing to tell a kid who is "learning to face adversity". I bet the cancer patient probably already knows a lot about adversity far more than he is ever going to learn from baseball.

I agree that sports by the nature of the way we set it up is competative, especially when it invloves kids. From my own observation I would also say that the kids who are most driven by their hyper vicarious parents are the same kids who have the most difficulty accepting winning and losing. Why? Because the parent has placed such a level of importance on winning that the child believes that their value as a son or daughter is conected with their performance on the field. In some cases they are right! My point is that for most of us, me included, high school ERA or batting avg is meaningless to my life as an adult, no one has ever asked me in a job interview if what my strike out to walk ratio was. I did not "learn to face adversity" from baseball. I learned a lot about the game and about the joy of playing on a team.

I reject little league as a way to learn about adversity. Because the adversity is made up, it is meaningless in the grand scheme of life and to view losing a little league game as adversity is wrong. Getting cancer, losing a parent, wondering where you next meal is going to come from, building a business, losing your job, being born drug addicted those things are adversities.

I am not opposed to the idea of keeping score or trying to win I think its great and it makes kids want to try harder. I just think we place to much emphasis on winning and not enough on having fun and learning.
_________________
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."- HST
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kosty
Hall of Fame


Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 5690
Location: The Shore to the South

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would anybody be crowing about this matter if the child with cancer had gotten a hit??? No. But because the kid struck out it's a big deal??? There are more important things to worry about in life than this bullshit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UMassHoops.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
subRed style by ktauber