| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should UMass-Lowell stay in Hockey East? |
| Yes |
|
51% |
[ 20 ] |
| No |
|
48% |
[ 19 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 39 |
|
| Author |
Message |
NDIrishUMassFan Sophomore

Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 219 Location: Amherst
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hatsoff Sophomore
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 98 Location: across the river
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From a purely Hockey point of view it is a no brainer that UML stays in Hockey East. There is no better place for a quality D1 team in Mass. None of the alternative D1 leagues are as convenient for the fan base. 10 teams works very well for HE.
Arguements based on economics etc are plain stupid - as mentioned on the other thread D1 athletics are about spreading the reputation of the schools involved and not P&L |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bleedmaroon Junior
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 536 Location: Sunderland, MA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holy Cross and & UConn, two D-1 schools come to H.E. for Lowell and Merrimack (two D II schools predominately) sounds like a logical deal from here. The latter two schools don't draw now, so they won't lose anything there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meff Senior
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 895 Location: Hanover
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like the Lowell press is trying to turn it to take UMass out. http://www.lowellsun.com/sports/ci_5349603
Of course the article lacks research and truth. I understand the fans of UML are frustrated, but if they continue throwing rock over at us the will lose support to keep them in Hockey East from us.
Personally I look at Minnesota and see having all the state schools play in the same league being a good thing which should be kept here as well, and honestly I think it will. But the fans spreading the rumor that its UMass/UMass fans trying to kill their program is crap and needs to stop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ktabz16 Hall of Fame

Joined: 20 Dec 2004 Posts: 8823 Location: frozen tundra of ME
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| holy shit what a crock full of manure... who wrote that thing rob greenfield? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
umass1234 Senior

Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 1369 Location: Western Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How can they print shit like that? Ktabz is right sounds like a Greenfield written article. Horrible stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rocks22 Hall of Fame

Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 9192
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
5 or 6 years ago when this issue came up and the program was ultimately saved by Cellucci, I went on record strongly supporting Lowell's program. In that time, their program has done little to nothing, their hardcore fans are obnoxious and know little to nothing about hockey, their players are more known for injuring opposing players than accomplishing anything, and I've never been to a game at Tsongas with more than 1000 people in attendance.
If they stay, whatever. If they go, see ya (and take Merrimack with you). _________________ UMass Hockey Blog:
http://www.fearthetriangle.com/
http://twitter.com/FearTheTriangle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
umass1234 Senior

Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 1369 Location: Western Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rocks22 wrote: | | their hardcore fans are obnoxious and know little to nothing about hockey |
Remember...its UMASS LOWELL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MertWindu Junior
Joined: 14 May 2003 Posts: 293
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's the worst thing I've ever read out of a legitimate professional newspaper. Bar none. How anyone could take the Lowell Sun sports section seriously right now is beyond me, if it's printing that thing unsigned. Unbelievable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UMassacre Freshman
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 24 Location: Inside Your Head
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention factually incorrect -- it claims the program has never won HE Coach of the Year -- Cahoon won it in 2003. _________________ Joblessness is no longer just for philosophy majors. Useful people are starting to feel the pinch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rocks22 Hall of Fame

Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 9192
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Same with them saying we've put no players in the NHL (correct answer is three) and we're having attendance problems (currently 15th in the nation in avg attendance).
I don't understand how something so completely innacurate can get published. _________________ UMass Hockey Blog:
http://www.fearthetriangle.com/
http://twitter.com/FearTheTriangle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The ole' swayback Junior
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lastly, if you want to look at attendance issues, look no further than Tsongas.
They don't draw dick for games against ANYONE... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff93 Junior
Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 742 Location: Auburn, MA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What a horrible HORRIBLE article. Was that a letter to the editor, or a newspaper-written editorial? I mean UMass didn't even play hockey from 1979 to 1993, so comparing the last 20 years of the programs is assinine.(i.e., "...Lowell has had five All-Americans over the last 20 years...") Then to use the all time record for UM Amherst...? I mean, most of our games have been played between 1908 and 1979...did they even wear helmets back then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris20 Hall of Fame

Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Posts: 7358 Location: Springfield
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeff, nice comments on that site.....if I was that dude's boss, I'd be pretty concerned with his total lack of reasearch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ktabz16 Hall of Fame

Joined: 20 Dec 2004 Posts: 8823 Location: frozen tundra of ME
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i heard they ran that article because they're afraid that their readership might drop into negative numbers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|