Game 3: NM State (at Springfield)

Anything and everything that is UMass Minutemen Basketball.
theguru
Junior
Posts: 413
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: SPRINGFIELD

Post by theguru » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:04 pm

they have 5 guys 6'10 or bigger on there roster, only one is an upper classmen but thats still a lot of size.

User avatar
UMatt
Junior
Posts: 348
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Ambler, PA

Post by UMatt » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:13 pm

Opening line I see has NMSU favored by 3.

JMalloy24
Sophomore
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:28 pm

Post by JMalloy24 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:26 pm

The writer for the DC also stated that the win over SHU was "impressive"... maybe it was his first time covering a hoops game...

User avatar
pursuitofanother
Freshman
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: western mass

Post by pursuitofanother » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:31 pm

putney needs to be ready to defend gillenwater 6-8 shooting 9-18 at three this year

User avatar
Refuse2Lose83
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Western Mass

Post by Refuse2Lose83 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:43 pm

I'm expecting this game to be very competitive and UMass's best played game of the season. I was rather surprised by how NMS looked against Arizona. After watching that game I came away believing that if UMass plays the way they are capable of (doesn't have to be their absolute A game though) and if the crowd can get behind them (like they have in Springfield) then I see us winning this one. I would not have thought that while walking out of Mullins on Wednesday night.

Things they need to do: Take good shots AND make them. They can not afford to miss shots like they did in the first 5 minutes of the 1st half against SH. I believe our guys are very capable of driving past their defenders to get in the paint and score or set each other up for 3. Along with driving the ball, they need to continue to work hard to get to the line and make their FT's.

I see the biggest key being our defense/rebounding. I'm grouping it as one because the defense needs to set the tempo and get New Mexico state going at a speed they are uncomfortable with. In the halfcourt, we need to have great ball pressure and take them away from what they want to do. NMS is most comfortable IMO running their stuff in the half court. If our defense can take them out of this, they will force them to take bad shots. That is the key-forcing bad looks and it all stems from getting NMS to play at a pace they don't want to and out of their sets. This is where rebounding comes in. UMass has not rebounded the ball like they did last year and are capable of doing so this year. Part of the reason is the slow starts from TV and Sean Carter. If they can get back on track then our rebounding will be back because guys like Sampson Carter and Hill and Bailey are doing great on the boards. adding these two will make this team a great rebounding team, and that is what they need tomorrow. They can't afford to give up second chance points. Also need to clean up some of their sloppy turnovers they've had in the 1st two games.

All in all though, I think we're going come out and do most of these things fairly well. I know the first 2 games haven't been that pretty but we've seen some good things and I think they start to put them togther tomorrow night.

It'll be a close competitive game and it's probably because I'm a UMass fan but I have a feeling they'll pull this one out in a very exciting game.

UMass 74 New Mexico State 70
Hire Matt McCall!

Floyd
Hall of Fame
Posts: 10796
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 am
Location: Not where I should be

Post by Floyd » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:28 pm

Need to run, run, run. This is when we are at our best
Time to Win

Roadtrip
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: Back in FL
Contact:

Post by Roadtrip » Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:55 am

Farrell says its "kill or be killed, and they ain't dying."

User avatar
MassMan06
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3172
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 8:59 am
Location: Eastern MA

Post by MassMan06 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:27 pm

I've seen these guys write inspirational stuff then come out flatter than Kate Moss too many times. Time to put up or shut up.

Go UMass.

Roadtrip
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: Back in FL
Contact:

Post by Roadtrip » Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:49 pm

^^^ Yes, if they play like we all know they can play, for the entire 40 minutes, they can be pretty good. If they play like we have seen so far, not so good.

Marty Peretz
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4089
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:13 am

Post by Marty Peretz » Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:41 pm

Head count? I'm there.

User avatar
InnervisionsUMASS
Hall of Fame
Posts: 19003
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:32 am
Location: Milford, MA
Contact:

Post by InnervisionsUMASS » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:24 pm

Hoping to get out of Milford by 4 or so... hope we have a decent crowd there!!
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades

User avatar
Chris20
Hall of Fame
Posts: 9396
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Springfield

Post by Chris20 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:40 pm

I expect a good game and a horrible crowd.

UmAstudent
Senior
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 6:06 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Post by UmAstudent » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:58 pm

UMatt wrote:Opening line I see has NMSU favored by 3.
What line are you looking at? UMass is -4 vs MMSU.

shovelhd
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3481
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Western MA

Post by shovelhd » Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:16 pm

Marty Peretz wrote:Head count? I'm there.
Pregame at Champions. Section 29 for the game. UMass Sutton t-shirt.

User avatar
UMatt
Junior
Posts: 348
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Ambler, PA

Post by UMatt » Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:52 pm

UmAstudent wrote:
UMatt wrote:Opening line I see has NMSU favored by 3.
What line are you looking at? UMass is -4 vs MMSU.
I was referring to the early line. I found it on sportsnetwork.com. I used to work there, so believe me, that might have been wrong :)


By the way, accuscore has us winning 70.6 to 70.4. I guess we'll just round those to 71-70. It had us winning 71-63 the last game...pretty damn close.

Post Reply