Max11 wrote:^^ and we still have a long way to go until we're at UConn level for Athletic Dept revenue. It's AAC or Bust for me. Agreed that we really need a good year to give ourselves a chance.
Edit to Add: which schools would be our main competitors for an open spot in the AAC? I'm thinking (in no order) Marshall, Buffalo, Southern Miss, Charlotte, Army, LA Tech?
Marshall, yes. I think they would be the biggest challenger for that spot if there were only one to be had. In fact, if there were only one, I think Marshall would probably get it over UMass.
Buffalo, no. I think they like where they are in the MAC right now, don't think AAC would really look to them anyways.
Southern Miss, no. C-USA forever unless they dropped down or something. LA Tech is also firmly entrenched in C-USA IMO. They do very well for themselves there, though I can see why they would be an option. I think the AAC might reach out to them.
Charlotte just joined FBS & C-USA, they have no history at this level, and it would be a tough look to jump from the conference that brought you in after like two years. They're a C-USA school IMO for a long time; also, I don't think the AAC would ask.
Army I've talked about on MM but I don't see them joining a conference again. They tried, didn't like it, left C-USA. The AAC is a better option than C-USA but I just don't see it happening. They don't have any real issues scheduling. I think they prefer the indy life myself.
UMass is a pretty attractive option for the AAC providing football can show necessary improvement. It gives the league 2 intense Northeast rivalries back at a time when it needs them. The problem is the league is at 12 football schools and has no incentive to add more to go to 14. They would have to get poached.