Priorities

Get ready for some MACtion
Floyd
Hall of Fame
Posts: 10437
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 8:50 am
Location: Not where I should be

Re: Priorities

Post by Floyd » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:42 am

Jack wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:01 am
So I'm on the same page as Floyd .... sorry Floyd :D
I'll start off by saying I love football and can't imagine a flagship school without a program. But I'll also say I compare things now to the basketball program of the early 80's ( which I sat thru). The Cage, while nostalgic, was a dump. Dirt floor, wood bleachers, small, zero amenities. But the change all started with upgrading the players. Started with Coach Tom up thru Cal, the talent improved, and momentum built. Cage became electric again, interest picked up, then the Mullins got built. Not saying football is going to be a nationally ranked program, but it should be able to be competitive enough to draw fans & bring in money.
That said, I think state government has a "show me first" kind of attitude relative to funding any new stadium. So any money in my mind should be to improve talent and the product on the field, and build momentum and the fan base so the state sees it as a worthwhile spend. A nice new stadium doesnt win games, players do
Time to Win

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Priorities

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:59 am

Floyd wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:42 am
Jack wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:01 am
So I'm on the same page as Floyd .... sorry Floyd :D
I'll start off by saying I love football and can't imagine a flagship school without a program. But I'll also say I compare things now to the basketball program of the early 80's ( which I sat thru). The Cage, while nostalgic, was a dump. Dirt floor, wood bleachers, small, zero amenities. But the change all started with upgrading the players. Started with Coach Tom up thru Cal, the talent improved, and momentum built. Cage became electric again, interest picked up, then the Mullins got built. Not saying football is going to be a nationally ranked program, but it should be able to be competitive enough to draw fans & bring in money.
That said, I think state government has a "show me first" kind of attitude relative to funding any new stadium. So any money in my mind should be to improve talent and the product on the field, and build momentum and the fan base so the state sees it as a worthwhile spend. A nice new stadium doesnt win games, players do
EXACTLY!!!!! the cage was a dump. I remember going to a few basketball games 1979-1980. 2-24!!!! what a season!!!! :lol: :lol: what I am saying is this: get rid of Bam. it's been 10 years. Let's win a fucking game. I don't care if its 1AA Sacred Heart or NAIA New Mexico Highlands. On X there is @Sparticus who seems to know about football. He says UMass stays FBS come hell or high water. I agree but if we go 0-36 thru 2027, then I think the MAC boots us. and that would be the end. Came so damn close vs Buffalo. Maybe Northern Illinois gets us a win.
The Zoo!!!!

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Priorities

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:04 pm

InnervisionsUMASS wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 am
McKinney wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:19 am
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:15 am someone explain to me how you lose a football game with the lead and the ball with 60 seconds left............We had 4 downs at 40 seconds each. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 1 minute to go???? HOW THE FUCK DID WE LOSE TO BUFFALO???
how are you still on this?

Absolutely bananas... he still thinks he is right about the sequence. Fucking crazy.
IV: what's fucking crazy??? seriously.....we got the INT. now it's 1st and 10 on our 10 yard line with 61 seconds to go. I think you're the one who's loopy. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 61 seconds to go??? you explain it
The Zoo!!!!

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Priorities

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:08 pm

InnervisionsUMASS wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 am
McKinney wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:19 am
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:15 am someone explain to me how you lose a football game with the lead and the ball with 60 seconds left............We had 4 downs at 40 seconds each. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 1 minute to go???? HOW THE FUCK DID WE LOSE TO BUFFALO???
how are you still on this?

Absolutely bananas... he still thinks he is right about the sequence. Fucking crazy.
the sequence ok Tony Romo, you've got the telestrator........or are you the post game show with Terry Bradshaw and Gronk and Jimmy Johnson.......or are you Mad Dog Chris Russo?? explain "genius".
The Zoo!!!!

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Priorities

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:20 pm

InnervisionsUMASS wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 am
McKinney wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:19 am
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:15 am someone explain to me how you lose a football game with the lead and the ball with 60 seconds left............We had 4 downs at 40 seconds each. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 1 minute to go???? HOW THE FUCK DID WE LOSE TO BUFFALO???
how are you still on this?

Absolutely bananas... he still thinks he is right about the sequence. Fucking crazy.
I'll help you, Vince Lombardi/John Madden:
College football has new clock rules for 2024

Consecutive timeouts: Teams are now prohibited from calling consecutive timeouts. OK, Scott Hansen, explain how UMass blew the game with the lead and the ball with 60 seconds to go. I don't care if it was 1st and 10 on the 25; 10, or goal line.
it's basic: the game clock does not stop after a running play. why didn't we run it 4 times
The Zoo!!!!

ZooMass84
Senior
Posts: 1838
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Priorities

Post by ZooMass84 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:40 pm

InnervisionsUMASS wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 am
McKinney wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:19 am
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:15 am someone explain to me how you lose a football game with the lead and the ball with 60 seconds left............We had 4 downs at 40 seconds each. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 1 minute to go???? HOW THE FUCK DID WE LOSE TO BUFFALO???
how are you still on this?

Absolutely bananas... he still thinks he is right about the sequence. Fucking crazy.
IV, I didn't go to the game, shame on me, maybe you did. I am planning on going to the NIU game come hell or high water. I'm not the best at driving at night, I've got eye issues now. Don't care if it takes me 3 hours each way.
The Zoo!!!!

User avatar
Rolling Ridge
Junior
Posts: 514
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:17 pm

Re: Priorities

Post by Rolling Ridge » Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:53 pm

ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:04 pmIV: what's fucking crazy??? seriously.....we got the INT. now it's 1st and 10 on our 10 yard line with 61 seconds to go. I think you're the one who's loopy. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 61 seconds to go??? you explain it
This has been addressed ad nauseum in the Buffalo game thread. Yes, Buffalo had all three timeouts remaining with about a minute to play. UMass could not simply run out the clock. They needed to get a first down. If you want to see the coach's full explanation, here it is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv0fFr8S0G0

Further comments on this should really be directed to the Buffalo game thread.

Online
User avatar
InnervisionsUMASS
Hall of Fame
Posts: 18575
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:32 am
Location: Milford, MA
Contact:

Re: Priorities

Post by InnervisionsUMASS » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:27 pm

Rolling Ridge wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:53 pm
ZooMass84 wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 12:04 pmIV: what's fucking crazy??? seriously.....we got the INT. now it's 1st and 10 on our 10 yard line with 61 seconds to go. I think you're the one who's loopy. Did Buffalo have all 3 time outs remaining with 61 seconds to go??? you explain it
This has been addressed ad nauseum in the Buffalo game thread. Yes, Buffalo had all three timeouts remaining with about a minute to play. UMass could not simply run out the clock. They needed to get a first down. If you want to see the coach's full explanation, here it is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv0fFr8S0G0

Further comments on this should really be directed to the Buffalo game thread.

THANK YOU!
Stop waiting for UMass to do something big and help UMass do something big. - Shades

Post Reply